Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Testing Compared with Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Viruses. 2021 May 12;13(5):895. doi: 10.3390/v13050895.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether self-collected pure saliva (SCPS) is comparable to nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in asymptomatic, mild patients with confirmed COVID-19. Thirty-one patients aged from 18 to 85 years were included between 9 June and 11 December 2020. A SCPS sample and a NP sample were taken for each patient. Quantitative PCR was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Results of SCPS vs. NP samples testing were compared. Statistical analyses were performed. Viral load was significantly correlated (r = 0.72). The concordance probability was estimated at 73.3%. In symptomatic adults, SCPS performance was similar to that of NP swabs (Percent Agreement = 74.1%; p = 0.11). Thus, the salivary test based on pure oral saliva samples easily obtained by noninvasive techniques has a fair agreement with the nasopharyngeal one in asymptomatic, mild patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; nasopharyngeal; saliva; viral load.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asymptomatic Diseases
  • COVID-19 / diagnosis*
  • COVID-19 Testing / methods*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasopharynx / virology*
  • RNA, Viral
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • SARS-CoV-2 / isolation & purification*
  • Saliva / virology*
  • Specimen Handling / methods
  • Viral Load / methods
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • RNA, Viral