Utilizing a responsive web portal for studying disc tracing agreement in retinal images

PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0251703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251703. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide whose detection is based on multiple factors, including measuring the cup to disc ratio, retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field defects. Advances in image processing and machine learning have allowed the development of automated approached for segmenting objects from fundus images. However, to build a robust system, a reliable ground truth dataset is required for proper training and validation of the model. In this study, we investigate the level of agreement in properly detecting the retinal disc in fundus images using an online portal built for such purposes. Two Doctors of Optometry independently traced the discs for 159 fundus images obtained from publicly available datasets using a purpose-built online portal. Additionally, we studied the effectiveness of ellipse fitting in handling misalignments in tracing. We measured tracing precision, interobserver variability, and average boundary distance between the results provided by ophthalmologists, and optometrist tracing. We also studied whether ellipse fitting has a positive or negative impact on properly detecting disc boundaries. The overall agreement between the optometrists in terms of locating the disc region in these images was 0.87. However, we found that there was a fair agreement on the disc border with kappa = 0.21. Disagreements were mainly in fundus images obtained from glaucomatous patients. The resulting dataset was deemed to be an acceptable ground truth dataset for training a validation of models for automatic detection of objects in fundus images.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Blindness / etiology
  • Blindness / prevention & control
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Datasets as Topic*
  • Fundus Oculi
  • Glaucoma / complications
  • Glaucoma / diagnosis*
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Internet*
  • Machine Learning
  • Observer Variation
  • Optic Disk / diagnostic imaging*
  • Optometrists / statistics & numerical data
  • Validation Studies as Topic

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Calgary Eye Foundation. Funding was utilized to upgrade the machine to develop the system and conduct the analysis. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.