Rationalising animal research synthesis in orthopaedic literature

World J Methodol. 2021 May 20;11(3):75-80. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.75.

Abstract

Systematic reviews in orthopaedic literature are frequently criticised for offering inconsistent conclusions. On top of that, high-quality randomized human evidence on crucial orthopaedic topics is more often than not lacking. In this situation, pooling animal literature could offer an excellent insight into unanswered critical clinical questions, thus potentially improving healthcare. In this paper, we sought to present the rationale and basic principles governing meta-analysis of animal research. More specifically, we elaborated on the available evidence-based methods to achieve a scientifically sound animal data synthesis. In addition, we discussed result interpretation, strength of recommendations and clinical implications based on the results of these meta-analytic modalities.

Keywords: Animal research; Evidence synthesis; Meta-analysis; Orthopaedics; in vivo.

Publication types

  • Review