Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment in Geriatric Patients

Marios Loucas; Rafael Loucas; Nico Safa Akhavan; Patrick Fries; Michael Dietrich

doi:10.1177/21514593211013790

Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment in Geriatric Patients

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 May 4:12:21514593211013790. doi: 10.1177/21514593211013790. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Marios Loucas^{1

2}, Rafael Loucas², Nico Safa Akhavan¹, Patrick Fries¹, Michael Dietrich¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Handsurgery and Traumatology at City Hospital Waid and Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland.
² Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background: Total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are becoming an increasingly standard procedure in the whole world. In conjunction with an aging population and increased prevalence of osteoporosis, proper management of periprosthetic, and interprosthetic fractures is of great interest to orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications and reoperations of IFFs in geriatric patients.

Methods: A retrospective single-institution case series study was conducted. Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Thirteen fractures were identified as IFFs. Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected preoperatively, and fractures were classified with the Vancouver and AO unified classification system (AO-UCS).

Results: We included 12 patients (13 hips) with IFFs (AO-UCS type IV.3 B (2/13) type IV.3 C (3/13), type IV.3 D (8/13)). The average patient age was 86.54 (range, 79-89) years. There were 10 females and 2 males. Perioperative morbidity has been identified in 10 of the 12 patients, and the 3-month and 1-year mortality were reported in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. Cerclage cables were used in 9 of 12 patients. One of 12 patients showed a local complication, with no documented implant failure or revision. Patients achieved complete union and returned to their preoperative ambulatory status, and full weight-bearing at an average of 5 (range, 2 to 7) months later.

Conclusion: Management of IFF can be challenging because these fractures require extensive surgical expertise. Locking plate seems to be a valuable treatment option for geriatric patients with IFFs. Despite the complexity of this type of fracture, the overall complication and revision rate, as well as the radiographic outcome are good to excellent.

Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Keywords: femoral fractures; geriatric trauma; interprosthetic fracture; locking plate; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty.