Diabetes Control During Massachusetts Insurance Reform

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01046-z. Epub 2021 May 19.

Abstract

Racial/ethnic disparities in glycemic control-a key diabetes outcome measure-continue to widen, even though the overall prevalence of glycemic control in the US has improved. Health insurance coverage may be associated with improved glycemic control, but few studies examine effects during a period of policy change. We assessed changes in glycemic control by racial/ethnic groups following the Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform for patients at two urban safety-net academic health systems between January 2005 and December 2013. We analyzed outcomes for three measures of poor glycemic control: 1) lack of a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) measure during a 6-month period; 2) A1C >8%; 3) A1C >9% before, during, and after implementation of insurance reform. We did not find increased rates of A1C monitoring or control following insurance reform overall or for specific racial/ethnic groups. We found evidence of worsened, not improved, glycemic control in some racial/ethnic groups in the post-reform period. The expansion of affordable insurance coverage was not associated with improved glycemic control in vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Asian; Black; Diabetes; Health disparities; Health insurance reform; Hispanic.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Diabetes Mellitus* / therapy
  • Glycated Hemoglobin
  • Health Care Reform
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Healthcare Disparities*
  • Humans
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Insurance, Health
  • Massachusetts
  • United States

Substances

  • Glycated Hemoglobin A