Fetal Growth Curves: Is There a Universal Reference?

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Jun;48(2):281-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.003.

Abstract

Three modern cohort studies have an advantage over historical fetal growth references because they included diverse populations. Despite similar inclusion criteria, estimated fetal weight percentiles for gestational age varied among studies, which result in different proportions of fetuses as being classified below or above a cutoff point. A universal reference would make comparison of fetal growth simpler for clinical use and for comparison across populations but may misclassify small-for-gestational-age or large-for-gestational-age fetuses. It is important to know how a growth reference performs in a local population in relation to fetal morbidity and mortality when implementing in clinical practice.

Keywords: Estimated fetal weight; Fetal growth; Fetal size; Growth variation; Ultrasound reference.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Fetal Development*
  • Fetal Growth Retardation / diagnosis*
  • Fetal Macrosomia / diagnosis*
  • Fetal Weight*
  • Gestational Age
  • Growth Charts
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Male
  • Pregnancy
  • Reference Standards
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal / methods