Immune response in dairy cattle against combined foot and mouth disease and haemorrhagic septicemia vaccine under field conditions

BMC Vet Res. 2021 May 5;17(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02889-8.

Abstract

Background: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and Haemorrhagic septicemia (HS) are two important diseases that are known to have caused significant economic losses to the cattle industry. Accordingly, vaccinations have been recognized as an efficient method to control and prevent both of the above-mentioned diseases. This study aimed to determine the immune response to FMD virus antigens and the recombinant outer membrane protein of HS (rOmpH) of Pasteurella multocida in cattle administered as a combination vaccine and compare antibody titers with the two vaccines given independently, under field conditions. Dairy cattle were divided into three groups. Each group was immunized with different vaccine types according to the vaccination program employed in this study. Antibody responses were determined by indirect ELISA, liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPB-ELISA) and viral neutralization test (VNT). Furthermore, the cellular immune responses were measured by lymphocyte proliferation assay (LPA).

Results: The overall antibody titers to HS and FMDV were above cut-off values for the combined FMD-HS vaccine in this study.The mean antibody titer against HS after the first immunization in the combined FMD-HS vaccine groups was higher than in the HS vaccine groups. However, no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between groups. Likewise, the antibody titer to the FMDV serotypes O/TAI/189/87 and Asia 1/TAI/85 determined by LPB-ELISA in the combined vaccine were not statistically significantly different when compared to the FMD vaccine groups. However, the mean VNT antibody titer of combined vaccine against serotype O was significantly higher than the VN titer of FMD vaccine groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, the LPA results showed that all vaccinated groups displayed significantly higher than the negative control (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no differences in the lymphocyte responses were observed in comparisons between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The combined FMD-HS vaccine formulated in this study could result in high both antibody and cellular immune responses without antigenic competition. Therefore, the combined FMD-HS vaccine can serve as an alternative vaccine against both HS and FMD in dairy cattle under field conditions.

Keywords: Combination vaccine; Dairy cattle; Foot and Mouth disease; Pasteurella multocida; rOmpH.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Cattle Diseases / immunology*
  • Cattle Diseases / prevention & control
  • Dairying / methods
  • Female
  • Foot-and-Mouth Disease / immunology*
  • Foot-and-Mouth Disease / prevention & control
  • Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
  • Hemorrhagic Septicemia / immunology*
  • Hemorrhagic Septicemia / prevention & control
  • Pasteurella multocida
  • Thailand
  • Vaccination / veterinary
  • Vaccines, Combined / immunology*

Substances

  • Vaccines, Combined