Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis

Mohandoss Nagalingam; Thaslim J Basheer; Vinayagamurthy Balamurugan; Rajeswari Shome; S Sowjanya Kumari; G B Manjunatha Reddy; Bibek Ranjan Shome; Habibur Rahman; Parimal Roy; J Joseph Kingston; R K Gandham

doi:10.14202/vetworld.2021.803-812

Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis

Vet World. 2021 Mar;14(3):803-812. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.803-812. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Affiliations

¹ ICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
² International Livestock Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
³ Defense Food Research Laboratory, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
⁴ National Institute of Animal Biotechnology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Abstract

Background and aim: The present serodiagnosis of brucellosis in livestock is based on the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharide of the Brucella organism in which specificity is hampered by the cross-reactivity, especially with the antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 organism. The problem can be addressed by screening for better immunodominant antigens. Hence, the present study was undertaken to screen protein antigens of Brucella abortus for their diagnostic potential in cattle brucellosis.

Materials and methods: Protein antigens of B. abortus (n=10) non-reactive to antibodies against Y. enterocolitica O:9 were selected, expressed in Escherichia coli, assessed the reactivity of expressed recombinant proteins by Western blot, standardized indirect-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting Brucella antibodies in cattle serum, and comparative evaluation was done.

Results: All the selected protein antigens were expressed and in the Western blot with Brucella antibodies positive cattle serum, six recombinant (Brucella protein 26 [BP26], Cu-Zn Superoxide dismutase [SodC], B. abortus I-1885, Serine protease, Bacterioferritin, and Brucella Lumazine Synthase [BLS]) proteins showed reaction whereas none of the proteins showed reactivity with Brucella negative cattle serum. ELISA has been done using known Brucella positive and negative cattle sera samples (n=113 each) in which the performance of recombinant proteins in diagnosing brucellosis was in the order of BP26 > BLS > SodC followed by rest of the proteins. BP26 based ELISA was found to be better with area under the curve as 0.953, and diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and Youden's index of 90.27%, 95.58%, and 0.8584, respectively, with the excellent agreement (k=0.85).

Conclusion: BP26 could be a potential diagnostic antigen among the immunodominant proteins of B. abortus in ruling out Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection while diagnosing brucellosis in cattle herds.

Keywords: Brucella abortus; Brucella lumazine synthase; Brucella protein26; Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase; Yersinia enterocolitica O:9; cattle brucellosis.