The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns

Dent Mater. 2021 Aug;37(8):e427-e434. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 25.

Abstract

Objective: Monolithic zirconia crowns have become a viable alternative to conventional layered restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the taper, and thus wall thickness, of the abutment or pre-defined cement space affect the fracture resistance or fracture mode of monolithic zirconia crowns.

Methods: A model tooth was prepared with a taper of 15° and a shallow circumferential chamfer preparation (0.5 mm). Two additional models were made based on the master model with a taper of 10° and 30° using computer-aided design software. Twenty monolithic 3rd generation translucent zirconia crowns were produced for each model with pre-defined cement space set to either 30 μm or 60 μm (n = 60). The estimated cement thickness was assessed by the replica method. The cemented crowns were loaded centrally in the occlusal fossa at 0.5 mm/min until fracture. Fractographic analyses were performed on all fractured crowns.

Results: The load at fracture was statistically significant different between the groups (p < 0.05). The crowns with 30° taper fractured at lower loads than those with 10° and 15° taper, regardless of the cement space (p < 0.05). The fracture origin for 47/60 crowns (78%) was in the cervical area, close to the top of the curvature in the mesial or distal crown margin. The remaining fractures started at the internal surface of the occlusal area and propagated cervically.

Significance: The fracture resistance of the monolithic zirconia crowns was lower for crowns with very large taper compared to 10 and 15° taper even though the crown walls were thicker.

Keywords: Cement thickness; Convergence angle; Dental crowns; Fractographic analyses; Fracture resistance; Taper; Zirconia.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Crowns
  • Dental Porcelain*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Materials Testing
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Dental Porcelain
  • Zirconium
  • zirconium oxide