The purpose of this study is to examine the maximum brightness of the monitor, which is suitable for radiological technologists' (hereinafter referred to as technicians) interpretation assistance and image inspection. The signal detection ability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using a chest X-ray image with a simulated nodule. In order to examine the ease of observation and the effect on the subjective evaluation by changing the maximum brightness, evaluation was performed by the normalized ranking method using chest X-ray images. ROC experiments were performed using images with and without simulated nodules in the chest phantom. There was no significant difference in detectability by changing the maximum brightness (p>0.05), but the average area under the curve (AUC) was higher at 350 cd/m2 than at 100 cd/m2 and 170 cd/m2. A normalized ranking method was performed focusing on simulated nodules on chest X-ray images. In the least significant difference (l.s.d.) method, there was a significant difference between the maximum luminance, and the higher the maximum luminance, the better the evaluation. From these results, the change in the maximum brightness did not significantly affect the signal detection ability of the technician's chest X-ray image, but the higher the maximum brightness, the easier it was to observe and the higher the subjective evaluation. It has been reported that the higher the maximum brightness, the shorter the signal recognition time, and a monitor with a high maximum brightness may lead to more efficient image inspection by a technician. From the results of this study, it is considered appropriate to use a medical liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor with a maximum brightness of 350 cd/m2 for the technician's interpretation assistance and image inspection.
Keywords: image inspection; interpretation assistance; maximum brightness; radiological technologist.