Incorporating partial adherence into the principal stratification analysis framework

Stat Med. 2021 Jul 10;40(15):3625-3644. doi: 10.1002/sim.8986. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

Participants in pragmatic clinical trials often partially adhere to treatment. However, to simplify the analysis, most studies dichotomize adherence (supposing that subjects received either full or no treatment), which can introduce biases in the results. For example, the popular approach of principal stratification is based on the concept that the population can be separated into strata based on how they will react to treatment assignment, but this framework does not include strata in which a partially adhering participant would belong. We expanded the principal stratification framework to allow partial adherers to have their own principal stratum and treatment level. The expanded approach is feasible in pragmatic settings. We have designed a Monte Carlo posterior sampling method to obtain the relevant parameter estimates. Simulations were completed under a range of settings where participants partially adhered to treatment, including a hypothetical setting from a published simulation trial on the topic of partial adherence. The inference method is additionally applied to data from a real randomized clinical trial that features partial adherence. Comparison of the simulation results indicated that our method is superior in most cases to the biased estimators obtained through standard principal stratification. Simulation results further suggest that our proposed method may lead to increased accuracy of inference in settings where study participants only partially adhere to assigned treatment.

Keywords: RCT; partial adherence; patient oriented research; pragmatic trial; principal stratification.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Computer Simulation
  • Humans
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design*