Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients: results of a pragmatic approach

Carlijn G N Voorend; Hanneke Joosten; Noeleen C Berkhout-Byrne; Adry Diepenbroek; Casper F M Franssen; Willem Jan W Bos; Marjolijn Van Buren; Simon P Mooijaart; POLDER investigators

doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00498-0

Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients: results of a pragmatic approach

Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Oct;12(5):931-942. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00498-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Authors

Carlijn G N Voorend¹, Hanneke Joosten², Noeleen C Berkhout-Byrne³, Adry Diepenbroek⁴, Casper F M Franssen⁴, Willem Jan W Bos^{3

5}, Marjolijn Van Buren^{3

6}, Simon P Mooijaart⁷; POLDER investigators

Collaborators

Affiliations

¹ Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.g.n.voorend@lumc.nl.
² Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Geriatric Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
³ Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
⁴ Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
⁵ Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
⁶ Department of Nephrology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
⁷ Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Purpose: Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD.

Methods: A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment.

Results: Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Conclusion: This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD.

Keywords: Aged; Chronic kidney diseases; Clinical decision-making; Consensus development; Frailty; Geriatric assessment.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Aged
Consensus
Geriatric Assessment
Humans
Nephrology*
Nutritional Status
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic* / diagnosis