A Disruptive Technology: Determining Need for Permanent Pacing After TAVR

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Apr 16;23(5):53. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01481-8.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the paradigm for management of severe aortic stenosis. Despite evolution of TAVR over the past 2 decades, conduction system disturbances remain a concern post-TAVR. In this review, we describe (1) permanent pacemaker (PP) implant rates associated with TAVR, (2) risk factors predicting need for PP therapy post-TAVR, (3) management of perioperative conduction abnormalities, and (4) novel areas of research.

Recent findings: Conduction disturbances remain a common issue post-TAVR, in particular, left bundle branch block (LBBB). Though newer data describes resolution of a significant fraction of these disturbances over time, rates of pacemaker therapy remain high despite improvements in valve technology and procedural technique. Recent consensus statements and guideline documents are important first steps in standardizing an approach to post-TAVR conduction disturbances. New areas of research show promise in both prediction and treatment of conduction disturbances post-TAVR.

Keywords: Conduction disturbances; Heart block; Permanent pacemaker; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis* / surgery
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / therapy
  • Bundle-Branch Block / therapy
  • Humans
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Risk Factors
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome