Comparison of first line chemotherapy regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a network meta-analysis

J Chemother. 2021 Dec;33(8):570-581. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1913703. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

The best first line chemotherapy regimen for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) remains inconclusive. Here, we aimed to find the best first line chemotherapy regimen by performing a network meta-analysis. Regimens were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), overall response rate(ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Twenty-eight eligible trials with a total of 6928 patients were included. EC (epirubicin + cisplatin) was considered as the better regimen for advanced STS with probability of 61.9% in terms of OS. However, this regimen only have been evaluated in a single small trial and tend to have more hematological toxicities than doxorubicin. No regimen was superior to doxorubicin with significant statistical difference in terms of PFS and ORR, even aldoxorubicin behaved better than doxorubicin in the network analysis. Collectively, doxorubicin still can be selected preferentially for the first line chemotherapy for patients.

Keywords: ASTS; Advanced soft tissue sarcoma; NMA; effect; first line chemotherapy; network meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Cisplatin / therapeutic use
  • Doxorubicin / therapeutic use
  • Epirubicin / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sarcoma / drug therapy*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Epirubicin
  • Doxorubicin
  • Cisplatin