Physiological and subjective comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a cooling environment

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249235. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Indoor comfort is influenced by airflow direction, but subjective evaluations can differ. This study evaluates the airflow comfort with subjective assessments and physiological measurements, including skin temperature, electroencephalograms, and electrocardiograms. Nineteen participants entered a test room at 20°C after staying in a room at 32°C for acclimation. They were exposed to indirect and direct airflow conditions to their faces and performed four tasks under each condition: resting, counting to 10 s following time alerts, counting to 10 s in mind, and mental calculation. Subjective assessments showed relatively higher thermal sensation and pleasantness under indirect airflow. The psychological time calculated from counting behaviors was longer under indirect airflow, indicating suppression of negative emotions. The face temperatures significantly declined during experiments under direct airflow. The beta and gamma bands of electroencephalograms were inhibited under the indirect condition, and these amplitudes were negatively correlated with pleasant feelings. Electrocardiogram parameters indicated that sympathetic nervous activity was predominant during counting, following alerts and mental calculation in indirect airflow. This study supports the comfort of indirect airflow based on reliable evidence.

MeSH terms

  • Air Conditioning / standards*
  • Body Temperature / physiology*
  • Brain Waves
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Perception*
  • Thermosensing
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.