Identifying optimal parameters for infrared neural stimulation in the peripheral nervous system

Abstract

Significance: Infrared neural stimulation (INS) utilizes pulsed infrared light to selectively elicit neural activity without exogenous compounds. Despite its versatility in a broad range of biomedical applications, no comprehensive comparison of factors pertaining to the efficacy and safety of INS such as wavelength, radiant exposure, and optical spot size exists in the literature. Aim: Here, we evaluate these parameters using three of the wavelengths commonly used for INS, 1450 nm, 1875 nm, and 2120 nm. Approach: In an in vivo rat sciatic nerve preparation, the stimulation threshold and transition rate to 100% activation probability were used to compare the effects of each parameter. Results: The pulsed diode lasers at 1450 nm and 1875 nm had a consistently higher ( $\sim 1.0J/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ ) stimulation threshold than that of the Ho:YAG laser at 2120 nm ( $\sim 0.7J/{\mathrm{cm}}^2$ ). In addition, the Ho:YAG produced a faster transition rate to 100% activation probability compared to the diode lasers. Our data suggest that the superior performance of the Ho:YAG is a result of the high-intensity microsecond spike at the onset of the pulse. Acute histological evaluation of diode irradiated nerves revealed a safe range of radiant exposures for stimulation. Conclusion: Together, our results identify measures to improve the safety, efficacy, and accessibility of INS technology for research and clinical applications.

Keywords: clinical translation; efficacy; in vivo; infrared neural stimulation; neurophotonics; peripheral nerves.