Treatment and outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fractures: A systematic review

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 Jan-Apr;29(1):23094990211003344. doi: 10.1177/23094990211003344.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to systematically review the literature comparing surgical treatments options and respective failure rates for basicervical hip fractures.

Methods: A comprehensive search of databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published in English on or before June 21, 2019 was performed. Selected search terms included "basicervical," "basi cervical," "AO/OTA type 31-B," "femoral neck fracture" AND "bone nails," "bone screws," "fracture fixation," "internal fixation," "arthroplasty," "cephalomedullary," "sliding hip screw," "ORIF," and "treatment outcome." We included studies that assessed outcomes of basicervical fracture fixation using open reduction internal fixation or arthroplasty. Two authors extracted the following data from each paper: study design, country, cohort year, definition of basicervical, intervention type, sample size, patient demographics, follow-up length, percent of fractures that required revision, and the percent of implants that failed.

Results: Sixteen articles encompassing 910 patients were included. The main outcome was the percent of implants that required revision. The total revision rates were 8% (8 studies, 157 patients, range 0%-55%) for cephalomedullary nails, 7% (10 studies, 584 patients, range 0%-18%) for sliding hip screws, 23% (3 studies, 40 patients, range 16%-50%) for cannulated screws, 0% (1 study, 6 patients) for total hip arthroplasty, and 8% (2 studies, 13 patients, range 0%-11%) for hemiarthroplasty.

Conclusion: Management of basicervical fractures with SHS and CMN produces similar failure and re-operation rates. Limited evidence is available on the use of cannulated screws and arthroplasty, but available studies suggest that cannulated screws have an unacceptable revision rate (23%) while arthroplasty may be acceptable. Future studies examining the comparative efficacy of various fixation methods would benefit from strict definition of fracture type as well as consistent reporting of functional outcomes, re-operation rates, and mortality.

Keywords: AO/OTA type 31-B; basicervical; femoral neck fracture; hip fracture.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Nails / adverse effects
  • Bone Nails / statistics & numerical data
  • Bone Screws / adverse effects
  • Bone Screws / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / diagnosis*
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / epidemiology
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / surgery*
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / adverse effects
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / statistics & numerical data
  • Hip Fractures / diagnosis*
  • Hip Fractures / epidemiology
  • Hip Fractures / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Open Fracture Reduction / adverse effects
  • Open Fracture Reduction / methods
  • Open Fracture Reduction / statistics & numerical data
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Prognosis
  • Reoperation / methods
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Treatment Outcome