Introduction: Working-hour restrictions, rota gaps and an increasing drive for theatre efficiency have resulted in challenges to surgical training. As a result, Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a popular tool to augment this training. Our aim was to evaluate the validity of a VR simulator for performing percutaneous pedicle screw guidewire insertion.
Materials and methods: Twenty-four participants were divided into three equal groups depending on prior surgical experience: a novice group (<10 procedures), an intermediate group (10-50 procedures) and an expert group (>50 procedures). All subjects performed four guidewire insertions on a TraumaVision® simulator (Swemac Innovation AB, Linköping, Sweden) in a set order. Six outcome measures were recorded; total score, time, fluoroscopy exposure, wire depth, zone of placement and wall violations.
Results: There were statistically significant differences between the groups for time taken (p<0.001) and fluoroscopy exposure (p<0.001). The novice group performed the worst, and the expert group outperformed both intermediates and novices in both categories. Other outcome results were good and less variable. There was an observed learning effect in the novice and intermediate groups between each of the attempts for both time taken and fluoroscopy exposure.
Conclusions: The study contributes constructive evidence to support the validity of the TraumaVision® simulator as a training tool for pedicle screw guidewire insertion. The simulator is less suitable as an assessment tool. The learning effect was evident in the less experienced groups, suggesting that VR may offer a greater benefit in the early stages of training. Further work is required to assess transferability to the clinical setting.