Total energy expenditure among children with motor, intellectual, visual, and hearing disabilities: a doubly labeled water method

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov;75(11):1607-1617. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00885-7. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have evaluated the total energy expenditure (TEE) of children with disabilities using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method; however, none have compared it by disability type. Furthermore, no large-scale studies have focused on the severity of motor disability (MD). We aimed to compare TEE in children with disabilities by disability type.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, TEE was measured using the DLW method, anthropometry, and weighted food records. The following comparisons were made: (1) TEEs among four disability types and (2) TEEs of three subgroups classified by MD based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).

Results: In total, 256 children (138 boys; ages 6-15 years) were studied. The comparison between the four disability types for boys in all age categories revealed that TEE (kJ/d) was lowest in MD, followed by intellectual disability (ID), visual disability, and hearing disability (HD), in that order. TEE/fat-free mass (FFM) (kJ/FFMkg/d) was also lowest in MD and highest in HD. TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were also lowest in MD and highest in HD in girls. For both boys and girls, TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were higher in the MD subtype GMFCS I-II than in GMFCS III-IV and GMFCS V.

Conclusions: TEE differed, depending on the disability type, and was the lowest in MD and highest in HD for both boys and girls. Analysis by GMFCS classification revealed that greater severity of motor dysfunction resulted in lower TEE.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Disabled Persons*
  • Energy Metabolism
  • Female
  • Hearing
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Disorders*
  • Water

Substances

  • Water