The Importance of Binomial Nomenclature for the Identification of Pollen Aeroallergens

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2642-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of atopic disorders associated with specific aerobiological triggers require basic botanical training. However, the identification of specific pollen can often be confounded by broad naming conventions that range from categorized colloquial to scientific names based on either higher taxonomic levels or, in some cases, binomial nomenclature. Physicians specializing in allergy often lack a comprehensive understanding with respect to plant taxonomy and botanical nomenclature that are critical skills required for clinical practice and research programs evaluating pollen and airborne fungal spores. In addition, binomial and current family designation and synonyms, including author citation are often misused, causing a misinterpretation of existing plants species or pollen types. It is critical that the correct botanical name is linked to a validated specimen and scientific naming conventions are used where possible by the clinician and researcher. In relation to pollen identification, we propose that clinicians and researchers should provide the currently accepted binomial nomenclature, offer relevant synonyms, and use the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group names.

Keywords: Allergy; Botanical nomenclature; Clinical immunology; Plant taxonomy; Pollen.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Plants*
  • Pollen*