Background: Previous literature shows systematic differences in health according to socioeconomic status (SES). However, there is no clear evidence that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection might be different across SES in Portugal. This work identifies the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worst-affected municipalities at four different time points in Portugal measured by prevalence of cases, and seeks to determine if these worst-affected areas are associated with SES.
Methods: The worst-affected areas were defined using the spatial scan statistic for the cumulative number of cases per municipality. The likelihood of being in a worst-affected area was then modelled using logistic regressions, as a function of area-based SES and health services supply. The analyses were repeated at four different time points of the COVID-19 pandemic: 1 April, 1 May, 1 June, and 1 July, corresponding to two moments before and during the confinement period and two moments thereafter.
Results: Twenty municipalities were identified as worst-affected areas in all four time points, most in the coastal area in the Northern part of the country. The areas of lower unemployment were less likely to be a worst-affected area on the 1 April [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.36 (0.14-0.91)], 1 May [AOR = 0.03 (0.00-0.41)] and 1 July [AOR = 0.40 (0.16-1.05)].
Conclusion: This study shows a relationship between being in a worst-affected area and unemployment. Governments and public health authorities should formulate measures and be prepared to protect the most vulnerable groups.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.