A comparative cost analysis between two quick diagnosis units of different levels of complexity

J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Apr;10(5):381-392. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0212. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

Abstract

Aim: To compare by micro-costing the costs incurred by quick diagnosis units of tertiary and second-level hospitals. Patients & methods: We included 407 patients from a tertiary and secondary hospital unit. A bottom-up approach was applied. Results: Cost per patient was €577.5 ± 219.6 in the tertiary versus €394.7 ± 92.58 in the secondary unit (p = 0.0559). Mean number of visits and ratio of successive/first visits were significantly higher in the former (3.098 and 2.07 vs 2.123 and 1.12, respectively). Personnel and indirect costs including their percent contribution to overall costs accounted for the main differences. Conclusion: A greater volume of appointments, number of staff and staff time and a greater complexity of patients from the tertiary hospital unit justified the differences in cost outcomes.

Keywords: hospital ambulatory medicine; indirect costs; micro-costing; personnel costs; quick diagnosis units; ratio of visits.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Humans
  • Quick Diagnosis Units*
  • Tertiary Care Centers