Neurocritical Care of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;21(5):20. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01107-0.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in otherwise refractory cardiopulmonary failure but are associated with significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. This review aims to characterize MCS-associated brain injury and discuss the neurocritical care of this population.

Recent findings: We found no practice guidelines or specific management strategies for the neurocritical care of patients with MCS devices. Acute brain injury was commonly observed in short-term and durable MCS devices. There is emerging evidence that a standardized neurological monitoring and management algorithm for MCS device-associated brain injury is feasible and potentially improves neurological outcomes. While MCS devices are associated with significant neurologic morbidity and mortality, there is scant evidence regarding optimal neuromonitoring and neurocritical care. With the increase in use of MCS devices for both short-term and durable applications, improved outcomes will depend on early identification and intervention of neurologic complications and further research into their pathophysiology.

Keywords: Brain injury; ECMO; LVAD; Mechanical circulatory support; Neurocritical care; Neurologic monitoring.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Heart Failure*
  • Heart-Assist Devices*
  • Humans