Non-anatomical placement may occur during the surgical implantation of the meniscal implant, and its influence on the resulting biomechanics of the knee joint has not been systematically studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of non-anatomical placement of the meniscal implant on the knee joint during a complete walking cycle. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses of the knee joint were performed, based on the model developed from magnetic resonance images and the loading conditions derived from the gait pattern of a healthy male subject, for the following physiological conditions: (i) knee joint with intact native meniscus, (ii) medial meniscectomized knee joint, (iii) knee joint with anatomically placed meniscal implant, and (iv) knee joint with the meniscal implant placed in four different in vitro determined non-anatomical locations. While the native menisci were modeled using the nonlinear hyperelastic Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden (HGO) constitutive model, the meniscal implant was modeled using the isotropic hyperelastic neo-Hookean model. Placement of the meniscal implant in the non-anatomical lateral-posterior and lateral-anterior locations significantly increased the peak contact pressure in the medial compartment. Placement of the meniscal implant in non-anatomical locations significantly altered the tibial rotational kinematics and increased the total force acting at the meniscal horns. Results suggest that placement of the meniscal implant in non-anatomical locations may restrain its ability to be chondroprotective and may initiate or accelerate cartilage degeneration. In conclusion, clinicians should endeavor to place the implant as closest as possible to the anatomical location to restore the normal knee biomechanics.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Finite element analysis; Knee joint; Meniscal implant; Non-anatomical placement; Osteoarthritis.