Bibliometric indicators to evaluate scientific activity

Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2021 May-Jun;63(3):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
[Article in English, Spanish]

Abstract

Bibliometric indicators have been devised to quantify scientific production and to try to evaluate its impact in the community. In general, bibliometric indicators can be classified according to whether the unit of analysis is the author (individual or group) or journal. The most widely used indicators for authors are those that measure an individual author's production, such as the Crown index or the h-index and its derivatives (e-index, h5-index, and the absolute or Ab-index, among others). The bibliometric indicators devised to try to evaluate journal quality are associated with Journal Citation Reports (e.g., impact factor, field-weighted citation impact, Eigenfactor, and article influence) or with Scopus (Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), source normalized impact per paper (SNIP), and CiteScore). This article describes the main bibliometric indicators, explains how they are calculated, and discusses their advantages and limitations.

Keywords: Bibliometric indicators; Factor de impacto; H-index; Impact factor; Indicadores bibliométricos; Radiology; Radiología; Índice h.