Posterior bending osteotomy: An effective measure to secure facial symmetry in orthognathic surgery

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior bending osteotomy and grinding techniques for orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry. Patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and who presented with a menton shift and setback difference exceeding 4 mm, were enrolled. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). Overall, 38 patients were included and divided into posterior bending osteotomy (n = 23) and grinding (n = 15) groups. Significant differences were observed between the posterior bending osteotomy and grinding groups on the treated side. In the grinding group, the gonion on the treated side was displaced slightly outward, resulting in a significant difference between both sides (non-treated side: 50.52 ± 4.20 [T0] and 48.67 ± 4.37 [T2]; treated side: 50.88 ± 4.55 [T0] and 51.00 ± 3.95 [T2]; p = 0.038). In the posterior bending osteotomy group, bilateral inward movements of the gonion were observed, and the distance from the midsagittal plane to the gonion did not differ significantly between the sides (non-treated side: 46.74 ± 4.41 [T0] and 45.54 ± 3.95 [T2]; treated side: 47.43 ± 4.93 [T0] and 45.18 ± 3.52 [T2]; p = 0.224). The yawing movement of the proximal segment was greater in the grinding group than in the posterior bending osteotomy group (non-treated side: p = 0.839; treated side: p = 0.025). Posterior bending osteotomy is recommended over the grinding method for patients with severe facial asymmetry, in order to ensure a symmetric and esthetic facial profile by allowing passive adaptation between the mandibular segments.

Keywords: BSSRO; Facial asymmetry; Orthognathic surgery; Posterior bending osteotomy.