FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX plus Panitumumab for Metastatic Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: Which "Side" Are You On?

Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):277-280. doi: 10.1002/onco.13705. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the results of the study by Pietrantonio et al., which evaluated the clinical conundrum of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy for metastatic left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer and appears in this issue. Both FOLFOXIRI [fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan] plus bevacizumab and FOLFOX [fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin] plus panitumumab have shown impressive activity in this population; however, the two have not been directly compared. The article by Pietrantonio et al. presents a propensity score-adjusted analysis using information from five previous randomized trials and provides best available evidence comparing these regimens. This commentary will discuss their results and how their findings fit in current treatment paradigms.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Bevacizumab / therapeutic use
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives
  • Camptothecin / therapeutic use
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Fluorouracil / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Leucovorin / therapeutic use
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Panitumumab / therapeutic use
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf* / genetics

Substances

  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Bevacizumab
  • Panitumumab
  • BRAF protein, human
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
  • Leucovorin
  • Fluorouracil
  • Camptothecin

Supplementary concepts

  • FOLFOXIRI protocol