Preservation of the Implant in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jun 1;86(6S Suppl 5):S491-S494. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002696.

Abstract

Background: Mastectomies are an integral part of breast cancer treatment for many patients.1 Of those patients, a significant number have previously undergone breast augmentation before being diagnosed with breast cancer. Therefore, we developed the novel technique of performing nipple- and implant-sparing mastectomies (NISMs) for women with prior breast augmentations. This study will assess the plausibility of using NISMs versus nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) in this subgroup of patients by comparing the complication rates.

Methods: Data were collected on age, tumor size, tumor grade, receptors, and the interval between mastectomy and implant exchange for both groups. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Independent samples t tests, χ2 tests, and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the NISM and NSM cohorts. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between complications and mastectomy type and was summarized as an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: Fifteen patients underwent an NISM and 35 patients underwent an NSM. The overall rate of complications was less in NISM cases than in NSM cases (20% vs 27%). However, this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.64; P = 0.278).

Conclusions: The overall complication rate was lower with NISMs compared with NSMs. Nipple- and implant-sparing mastectomy is a novel, viable, and safe option for patients with breast cancer and a history of submuscular breast augmentation.

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mammaplasty*
  • Mastectomy
  • Mastectomy, Subcutaneous*
  • Nipples / surgery
  • Organ Sparing Treatments
  • Retrospective Studies