Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) could not prove a significant reduction in postoperative stay and therefore did not provide sufficient evidence of IA. Recently, we reported a new intracorporeal anastomosis method and intracorporeal end-to-end anastomosis (IEEA). However, there have been no studies comparing intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis (ISSA) to IEEA.
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to verify the superiority of IA over EA. The secondary purpose is to compare IEEA with ISSA.
Methods: Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer are recruited to the CONNECT study (multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study), cases in which anastomosis by the double-stapling technique is planned will be excluded. The target sample size is set at 300 cases in total, which will be randomized into 3 groups (EA, IEEA, and ISSA) in a 2:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the length of postoperative hospital stay in the IA and EA groups; the secondly endpoint is the anastomotic time in IEEA and ISSA groups. We will also evaluate SF-36 ver.2, EORTC QLQ-C30 ver.3, operator stress using SURG-TLX, and the long-term outcomes, such as 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival.
Conclusions: This RCT will compare the postoperative length of stay between IA and EA in twice the number of cases of previous RCTs. Concurrently, although as a secondary purpose, this will be the first study to compare IEEA and ISSA.
Trial registration: This trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry in September 2020 as UMIN000041565.
Keywords: Colon cancer; Extracorporeal anastomosis; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Laparoscopic colectomy; Side-to-side anastomosis.