Relevance of Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Cancer in Well-selected Patients: A Propensity-matched Comparison With Laparotomy

Anticancer Res. 2021 Feb;41(2):955-965. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14849.

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of laparoscopy in comparison with laparotomy in the management of ovarian cancer in well-selected patients.

Patients and methods: Data of consecutive ovarian cancer patients treated by laparoscopy were matched 1:1 to a cohort of patients operated by laparotomy using a propensity score matching. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a complete staging procedure in the early stages and optimal upfront or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Results: In total, 153 patients were included. Propensity score matching led to the analysis of 41 well-balanced pairs of patients. For a median follow-up of 34.0 [19.0-64.0] months and 38.0 [24.5-75.0] months, respectively, no difference was found between the two groups in regards to overall survival (p=0.28) and disease-free survival (p=0.89).

Conclusion: In well-selected patients, laparoscopic surgery may be a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Laparotomy
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Propensity Score
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome