Purpose: Entrainment is a useful method for locating reentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) circuits, but alterations or termination of the AT can derail this process. We assessed whether resetting an upstream site of a neighboring electrode by a scanned extrastimulus at a downstream site (when the upstream tissue was refractory) could diagnose that site within the AT circuit.
Methods: The procedure was applied to 48 ATs with a cycle length (CL) of 238 ± 42 ms (26 common flutters, 8 perimitral flutters, 7 left atrial [LA] roof-dependent AT, 3 LA scar-related macroreentrant ATs, 2 pulmonary vein-gap reentry tachycardias, 1 right atrial scar-related macroreentrant AT, and 1 with an unidentified circuit). Entrainment and scanned extrastimulation were attempted at the cavotricuspid isthmus, LA roof, and mitral isthmus and/or critical AT isthmus.
Results: Within the circuit, the post-pacing interval minus the ATCL after entrainment was < 30 ms for all ATs and resetting of the AT cycle by ≥ 5 ms occurred in 94% of the ATs. No ATs were reset by extrastimulation outside the circuit. The positive predictive value of both maneuvers for locating the circuit was 100%, and the negative predictive value of the extrastimulation was similar to that of entrainment (96% vs. 100%, P = 0.25). The incidence of an AT alteration was lower with extrastimulation than with entrainment (1% vs. 9%, P = 0.01). For ATs with a CL < 210 ms, extrastimulation yielded a good diagnostic performance without any AT alterations.
Conclusion: AT resetting by a scanned extrastimulus is diagnostic and avoids AT alterations.
Keywords: Atrial tachycardia; Entrainment pacing; Macroreentry; Reset; Scanned extrastimulus delivery.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.