Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women

J Am Coll Health. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(8):2476-2482. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1865981. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female undergraduate students. Methods: Participants completed measures of internalization of the thin- and muscular-ideals, body dissatisfaction, body checking, and body avoidance. Results: Analyses revealed that approximately 24.9% of participants endorsed scores in the upper quartile on thin-ideal internalization, and 27.4% of participants fell in the upper quartile of muscular-ideal internalization, while 10.3% endorsed high internalization of both ideals. Analyses revealed that individuals endorsing only the thin-ideal reported significantly higher levels of body dissatisfaction and body avoidance than those endorsing the fit-ideal. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggested that thin- and muscular-ideal internalization present different patterns of association depending on whether an individual endorses one or both of these body ideals.

Keywords: Body ideals; body image; fit-ideal internalization; muscular-ideal internalization; thin-ideal internalization.

MeSH terms

  • Body Image*
  • Feeding and Eating Disorders*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Prevalence
  • Students
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Thinness
  • Universities