Author's reply (in reference to letter to editor proposed by Etem Caliskan, Catherine J. Pachuk, Louis P. Perrault, Maximilian Y Emmert and entitled: preservation solutions to improve graft patency: The devil is in the detail)

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 21;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01391-4.

Olivier Fouquet^{1

2}, Jean-David Blossier^{3

4}, Simon Dang Van^{5

3}, Pauline Robert³, Agnès Barbelivien³, Frédéric Pinaud^{5

3}, Patrice Binuani⁵, Maroua Eid⁵, Daniel Henrion^{3

6}, Laurent Loufrani^{3

6}, Christophe Baufreton^{5

3}

¹ Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU, Angers, France. olfouquet@chu-angers.fr.
² Institute MITOVASC CNRS UMR 6015, INSERM, 1083, Angers, France. olfouquet@chu-angers.fr.
³ Institute MITOVASC CNRS UMR 6015, INSERM, 1083, Angers, France.
⁴ Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
⁵ Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU, Angers, France.
⁶ University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.

Abstract

Not applicable.

Keywords: Graft patency; Preservation solutions; Venous graft.