Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) versus IVT-AFL plus rescue photodynamic therapy (IVT-AFL + rPDT) in the subgroup of Japanese patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) enrolled in the PLANET study.
Study design: A 96-week, double-masked, sham-controlled phase-3b/4 randomized clinical trial conducted at multiple centers from May 2014 to August 2016.
Patients and methods: Patients with PCV (BCVA 73-24 ETDRS letters [20/40-20/320 Snellen]) received 3 initial monthly doses of IVT-AFL 2 mg. At week 12, the patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to IVT-AFL + sham PDT or IVT-AFL + rPDT. Patients not requiring rescue received IVT-AFL every 8 weeks; those requiring rescue received IVT-AFL monthly plus sham/active PDT. Following week 52, the treatment intervals could be extended > 8 weeks.
Results: The baseline demographics for the 159 Japanese patients were balanced. At week 96, the mean BCVA change was + 9.7 (IVT-AFL) versus + 9.5 letters (IVT-AFL + rPDT) (least-squares mean difference of - 0.3; 95% CI, - 3.7 to 3.1); the mean central subfield thickness reduction was - 148.0 µm versus - 145.9 µm. Overall, 17.1% of the patients required rescue PDT. At week 96, 25.0% (IVT-AFL) and 37.9% (IVT-AFL + rPDT) of the patients had complete polyp regression; 84.1% (IVT-AFL) and 88.4% (IVT-AFL + rPDT) of the patients had no evidence of active polyps. The mean number of injections (weeks 52-96) were 4.6 (IVT-AFL) and 4.5 (IVT-AFL + rPDT). Overall, 36.0% (IVT-AFL) and 33.8% (IVT-AFL + rPDT) of the patients experienced ocular treatment-emergent adverse events.
Conclusion: IVT-AFL monotherapy was efficacious for the treatment of Japanese patients with PCV, and the addition of rescue PDT did not show additional benefits.
Keywords: Aflibercept; Anti-VEGF; Antivascular endothelial growth factor; Photodynamic therapy; Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.