Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems use brain activity as an input signal and enable communication without requiring bodily movement. This novel technology may help impaired patients and users with disabilities to communicate with their environment. Over the years, researchers investigated the performance of subjects in different BCI paradigms, stating that 15%-30% of BCI users are unable to reach proficiency in using a BCI system and therefore were labelled as BCI illiterates. Recent progress in the BCIs based on the visually evoked potentials (VEPs) necessitates re-considering of this term, as very often all subjects are able to use VEP-based BCI systems. This study examines correlations among BCI performance, personal preferences, and further demographic factors for three different modern visually evoked BCI paradigms: (1) the conventional Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) based on visual stimuli flickering at specific constant frequencies (fVEP), (2) Steady-State motion Visual Evoked Potentials (SSmVEP), and (3) code-modulated Visual Evoked Potentials (cVEP). Demographic parameters, as well as handedness, vision correction, BCI experience, etc., have no significant effect on the performance of VEP-based BCI. Most subjects did not consider the flickering stimuli annoying, only 20 out of a total of 86 participants indicated a change in fatigue during the experiment. 83 subjects were able to successfully finish all spelling tasks with the fVEP speller, with a mean (SD) information transfer rate of 31.87 bit/min (9.83) and an accuracy of 95.28% (5.18), respectively. Compared to that, 80 subjects were able to successfully finish all spelling tasks using SSmVEP, with a mean information transfer rate of 26.44 bit/min (8.04) and an accuracy of 91.10% (6.01), respectively. Finally, all 86 subjects were able to successfully finish all spelling tasks with the cVEP speller, with a mean information transfer rate of 40.23 bit/min (7.63) and an accuracy of 97.83% (3.37).