Clinical outcomes of open and closed management after surgical treatments in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Abstract

Context and purpose: To achieve success following surgical treatment of MRONJ, complete wound closure has been considered necessary; open wound management has not been generally recommended. Therefore, various closure techniques using local flaps have been reported. However, these techniques often increase surgical invasiveness, and there is minimal evidence regarding whether complete wound closure is preferable to open wound management following surgical treatment of MRONJ. The aim of this study was to clarify whether complete wound closure is necessary for successful healing following surgical treatment of MRONJ.

Procedures: This retrospective study included 52 patients with stage 2 and 3 MRONJ who underwent surgical treatment. Twenty-seven of the 52 patients received open wound management, while the remaining 25 received complete wound closure management. The outcomes of both groups were evaluated at the 6-month follow-up visit; 'success' was defined as complete mucosal covering without symptoms and 'failure' was defined as the presence of residual bone exposure or progression of disease.

Main findings: In the open wound group, 23 patients (85.1%) exhibited 'success' and four patients (14.8%) exhibited 'failure'; in the closed wound group, 21 patients (84.0%) exhibited 'success' and four patients (16.0%) exhibited 'failure'. These outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Principal conclusions: Although complete wound closure has many advantages with respect to the healing process, open wound management is also acceptable for patients with difficulty achieving complete wound closure, as well as for surgeons who wish to reduce surgical invasiveness.

Keywords: Complete wound closure; MRONJ; Open wound management; Stage 2 and 3; Surgical technique.