Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Pulmonary Valve Implantation

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to describe the recent trends and in-hospital outcomes with percutaneous pulmonic valve implantation (PPVI) and surgical pulmonic valve replacement (SPVR) in adult hospitals in the US after the availability of both the Melody valve (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) and the Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).

Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (NIS) from January 2016 to December 2017 to identify hospitalizations for PPVI and SPVR.

Results: We identified 5455 weighted discharges with PPVI and SPVR (PPVI=1140, SPVR=4305). PPVI procedures had increased in number over 2016 and 2017 (115 procedure at the first quarter of 2016, 195 procedures in the final quarter of 2017, P-trend=0.086), while SPVR volume remained constant. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was low with both procedures (SPRV: 1.6% vs. PPVI: 0.9%, p=0.071). SPVR had worse in-hospital outcomes, was associated with a longer length of stay [5 days vs. 1 day, p<0.001], and comparable cost of index hospitalization [$51,657 vs. $51,193] compared with PPVI.

Conclusion: After approval of the Sapien valve for commercial use in 2016, PPVI procedures have increased in frequency. PPVI is associated with lower procedural complications than SPVR, however, both carry a low risk of mortality. Despite the higher cost of the valves and delivery systems, PPVI is associated with a slightly lower cost of index hospitalization compared with SPVR, likely due to the higher in-hospital complications and LOS of the latter.

Keywords: PPVI; Percutaneous pulmonic valve implantation; Surgical pulmonic valve replacement.