Waterpipe Warning Placement and Risk Perceptions: An Eye Tracking Study

Am J Health Behav. 2021 Jan 1;45(1):186-194. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.45.1.15.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to select a health warning message location on a waterpipe (WP) that both attracted visual attention and conveyed the risks associated with WP smoking. Methods: During June through November 2019, we conducted a within-subjects randomized experiment (N = 74) using eye tracking equipment to examine visual attention to 3 placements of a health warning on the WP (stem, water bowl, hose). We asked young adult ever WP users 3 questions about WP harm perceptions. We used generalized linear mixed models to examine the amount of fixation time spent on the placement locations; we used repeated measures ANOVA to model changes in harm perceptions. Results: There were statistically significant differences across all 3 placement locations; regardless of place, all HWLs attracted a comparable amount of visual attention. Absolute WP harm perceptions significantly increased following the experiment and remained significantly higher at the one-week follow-up, compared to baseline. Conclusions: Warnings on WPs attracted visual attention and increased harm perceptions, and those harm perceptions remained high one week after the experiment. Findings indicate the value of including a warning on the WP device, and underscore the necessity and effectiveness of those health warnings to combat WP harm misperceptions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Eye-Tracking Technology*
  • Humans
  • Perception
  • Product Labeling*
  • Risk Assessment*
  • Smoking Water Pipes
  • Water Pipe Smoking*
  • Young Adult