Background/aim: The skin conductance responses (SCRs) are a well-accepted indicator of physiological arousal for both research purposes and clinical approaches. The shape of SCRs is analyzed by various features. However, the estimation of how much (in %) one feature can explain another is still an open issue. The aim of this study was to assess whether variation in one SCR feature predicts changes in other features.
Methods: Skin conductance (SC) was measured during relaxation and mental stress in 40 subjects. SCRs were induced by three external stimuli, which were deep breath, a mental arithmetic, task and a visual task.
Results: The findings of this study showed that about 55% (R2 = 0.55) of the variation in the half recovery time (SCRs_rec 50%) can be explained by the rise time (SCRs_ris), whereas variation in amplitude of the skin conductance responses (SCRs_amp) and the skin conductance level (SCL) is independent and cannot be explained by the other features, as R2 values obtained from all analyses among these SCR features in average were lower 0.19.
Conclusions: The study results suggest that the two timing phases (SCRs_rec and SCRs_ris) are not completely independent from each other, although they might be governed by different sweating mechanisms (secretion and reabsorption). However, SCRs_amp and SCL were independent. These findings can help in choosing the optimal set of features of an automated system for processing EDA, which reflect the alterations in the activation level generated during an emotional episode.
Keywords: amplitude; electrodermal activity; recovery time; rise time; skin conductance.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.