Systematic review of education and practical guidance on regression modeling for medical researchers who lack a strong statistical background: Study protocol

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0241427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241427. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In the last decades, statistical methodology has developed rapidly, in particular in the field of regression modeling. Multivariable regression models are applied in almost all medical research projects. Therefore, the potential impact of statistical misconceptions within this field can be enormous Indeed, the current theoretical statistical knowledge is not always adequately transferred to the current practice in medical statistics. Some medical journals have identified this problem and published isolated statistical articles and even whole series thereof. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the current level of education on regression modeling that is provided to medical researchers via series of statistical articles published in medical journals. The present manuscript is a protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess which aspects of regression modeling are covered by statistical series published in medical journals that intend to train and guide applied medical researchers with limited statistical knowledge. Statistical paper series cannot easily be summarized and identified by common keywords in an electronic search engine like Scopus. We therefore identified series by a systematic request to statistical experts who are part or related to the STRATOS Initiative (STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies). Within each identified article, two raters will independently check the content of the articles with respect to a predefined list of key aspects related to regression modeling. The content analysis of the topic-relevant articles will be performed using a predefined report form to assess the content as objectively as possible. Any disputes will be resolved by a third reviewer. Summary analyses will identify potential methodological gaps and misconceptions that may have an important impact on the quality of analyses in medical research. This review will thus provide a basis for future guidance papers and tutorials in the field of regression modeling which will enable medical researchers 1) to interpret publications in a correct way, 2) to perform basic statistical analyses in a correct way and 3) to identify situations when the help of a statistical expert is required.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Biomedical Research / education
  • Biomedical Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Biostatistics / methods
  • Data Collection
  • Data Management
  • Data Science / education
  • Data Science / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Regression Analysis*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the project [SA580/10-1] to Willi Sauerbrei and through the joint German-Austrian DFG and FWF project [DFG: RA-2347/8-1] to Geraldine Rauch and [FWF: I-4739-B] to Georg Heinze. Apart from this project, this research received no additional funding from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This paper was written on behalf of the topic group 2 of the STRATOS initiative (STRengthening Analytical Thinking in Observational Studies), which is a collaborative network of experts with background in many different areas of biostatistical and epidemiological methods. (http://www.stratos-initiative.org/, accessed October 2020).