Comparison of 2-D Shear Wave Elastography and Point Shear Wave Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis

Abstract

Progressive liver fibrosis may result in cirrhosis, portal hypertension and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. We performed a meta-analysis to compare liver fibrosis staging in chronic liver disease patients using 2-D shear wave elastography (2-D SWE) and point shear wave elastography (pSWE). The PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched until May 31, 2020 for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of 2-D SWE and pSWE in assessing liver fibrosis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios and area under receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated using the bivariate random effects model. As a result, 71 studies with 11,345 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of 2-D SWE and pSWE significantly differed for the detection of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2; 0.84 vs. 0.76, p < 0.001) and advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3; 0.90 vs. 0.83, p = 0.003), but not for detection of cirrhosis (F = 4; 0.89 vs. 0.85, p = 0.090). The pooled specificities of 2-D SWE and pSWE did not significantly differ for detection of F ≥ 2 (0.81 vs. 0.79, p = 0.753), F ≥ 3 (0.87 vs. 0.83, p = 0.163) or F = 4 (0.87 vs. 0.84, p = 0.294). Both 2-D SWE and pSWE have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting each stage of liver fibrosis. Two-dimensional SWE has higher sensitivity than pSWE for detection of significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis.

Keywords: 2-D shear wave elastography; Area under receiver operating characteristic curve; Liver fibrosis; Point shear wave elastography; Sensitivity; Specificity.