Aim Evaluation of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive, valve-sparing interventions on the aortic root and a comparative analysis of outcomes versus a group of patients with a complete sternotomy intervention using the method of propensity score matching (PSM).Materials and methods From 2016 through 2019, 458 interventions on the aortic root were performed, including 160 (36.6 %) interventions with mini-sternotomy. The study included 106 patients with the valve-sparing surgery (David procedure). Two groups of 30 patients each were formed using PSMC: group 1, complete sternotomy (CS) and group 2, J-shaped mini-sternotomy (MS). Immediate and long-term outcomes were evaluated at 13.8±10.3 (1-38 months (min-max) in the MS group and 42±21 (1-61 months (min-max) in the CS group.Results Statistically significant differences in death rate, echocardiographic indexes, absence of reoperations and complications in the postoperative period were not observed. In group 2, durations of extracorporeal circulation (p=0.04) and period of myocardial ischemia (p=0.004) were increased. The same group showed decreased intraoperative blood loss (p=0.001), postoperative drainage losses (p=0.0001), extubation time (р=0.0001), duration of stay in resuscitation and intensive care units and in the department of reconstructive recovery cardiovascular surgery (p=0,005).Conclusion The David procedure with mini-sternotomy is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional approach. This technique significantly reduces the time of rehabilitation and duration of patients' stay in the hospital without significant differences in the long-term period, which suggests advantages of this method. However, despite these promising results, the retrospective nature of this study, a small sample of patients, and a short follow-up period warrant further study.