Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement during the COVID-19 pandemic-Current practice and concerns

J Card Surg. 2021 Jan;36(1):260-264. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15182. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on the provision of healthcare. COVID-19 can manifest with cardiac and thrombotic presentations. Additionally, patients with cardiovascular comorbidities are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes related to COVID-19 infection. This in turn has led to a significant reduction in the provision of cardiac surgery with alternative management options utilized to address patients with significant disease. In terms of aortic valve disease, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) provides advantages over surgical aortic valve replacement in with a lower burden on healthcare resources. COVID-19 also resulted in changes in management strategies and as such TAVI is now being considered in younger- and low-risk patients. However, long term data with regard to TAVI is still unknown, and the use in patient groups that have been excluded in the large pivotal studies that established TAVI as an alternative to surgery has raised specific concerns in the use of TAVI as the preferred treatment choice. With the long term ramification unknown, it is essential that decisions are made with caution.

Keywords: COVID-19; TAVI; aortic valve disease; aortic valve replacement; cardiac surgery.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / epidemiology
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / surgery*
  • COVID-19 / epidemiology*
  • Comorbidity
  • Global Health
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis / standards*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Pandemics
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Risk Factors
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement / standards*