Determinants of response to inhaled extrafine triple therapy in asthma: analyses of TRIMARAN and TRIGGER

Respir Res. 2020 Oct 29;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01558-y.

Abstract

Background: A number of single-inhaler triple therapies are being developed for asthma, including the extrafine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP), formoterol fumarate (FF), and glycopyrronium (G). Given asthma is a heterogenous disease, we investigated whether the clinical response to the addition of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist component within inhaled triple therapy was impacted by a range of clinical characteristics.

Methods: These were pre-specified and post-hoc sub-group analyses of TRIMARAN and TRIGGER, which were double-blind, 52-week studies comparing medium-strength (100/6/10 µg; TRIMARAN) and high-strength (200/6/10 µg; TRIGGER) BDP/FF/G with the respective BDP/FF strengths in adults with uncontrolled asthma and a history of ≥ 1 exacerbation. Co-primary endpoints were pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at Week 26 and the rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations over 52 weeks. Key secondary endpoints: peak FEV1 at Week 26 and average morning peak expiratory flow over the first 26 weeks in each study, and severe exacerbation rate over 52 weeks (pooled data).

Results: Baseline clinical characteristics (pre-specified analyses) had no consistent effect on the lung function improvements with BDP/FF/G. For the exacerbation endpoints, sub-groups with higher reversibility gained greatest relative benefit from BDP/FF/G versus BDP/FF. In post-hoc analyses with patients sub-grouped by screening blood eosinophil values, in TRIMARAN the greatest relative effect of BDP/FF/G versus BDP/FF on the lung function endpoints was in the ≤ 300 cells/µL group; in TRIGGER, eosinophil levels did not markedly influence the relative efficacy of BDP/FF/G versus BDP/FF. Eosinophil levels did not influence relative efficacy on moderate-to-severe or severe exacerbations.

Conclusion: Overall, the relative efficacy of extrafine BDP/FF/G versus BDP/FF was not influenced by a range of clinical characteristics. However, some patient sub-groups gained additional benefit from BDP/FF/G for certain endpoints. In particular, for exacerbations the relative efficacy of BDP/FF/G was greater in more reversible patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: TRIMARAN, NCT02676076 (registered February 8, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02676076?term=NCT02676076&draw=2&rank=1 ,); TRIGGER, NCT02676089 (registered February 8, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02676089?term=NCT02676089&draw=2&rank=1 ).

Keywords: Asthma; Eosinophils; Inhaled corticosteroids; Long-acting muscarinic antagonists; Long-acting β2-agonists; Pharmacotherapy; Subgroup analyses.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asthma / diagnosis
  • Asthma / drug therapy*
  • Asthma / physiopathology
  • Beclomethasone / administration & dosage*
  • Bronchodilator Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Formoterol Fumarate / administration & dosage*
  • Glycopyrrolate / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscarinic Antagonists / administration & dosage*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Muscarinic Antagonists
  • Beclomethasone
  • Glycopyrrolate
  • Formoterol Fumarate

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02676076
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02676089