Quantitative Comparison of the Vascular Structure of Macular Neovascularizations Between Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Henrik Faatz; Kai Rothaus; Martin Ziegler; Marius Book; Claudia Lommatzsch; Georg Spital; Matthias Gutfleisch; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Albrecht Lommatzsch

doi:10.2147/OPTH.S276114

Quantitative Comparison of the Vascular Structure of Macular Neovascularizations Between Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 9:14:3179-3186. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S276114. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Henrik Faatz¹, Kai Rothaus¹, Martin Ziegler¹, Marius Book¹, Claudia Lommatzsch^{1

2}, Georg Spital¹, Matthias Gutfleisch¹, Daniel Pauleikhoff^{1

3

4}, Albrecht Lommatzsch^{1

3

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
² Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
³ Department of Ophthalmology, University of Essen-Duisburg, Essen, Germany.
⁴ Achim Wessing Institute for Imaging in Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to ascertain and quantify the differences between swept-source (SS) and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Patients and methods: SD-OCTA (RTVue Avanti) and SS-OCTA (PLEX^® Elite 9000) were performed in 37 patients with MNV in nAMD. The MNV was delineated and the data were processed via ImageJ. The parameters MNV area, nodes per area, fractal dimension (FD), and flow density were analyzed using MatLab.

Results: There was close agreement between the two devices regarding MNV area (ICCc 0.977, ICCa 0.977, R² 0.977), but only slight agreement regarding nodes per area (ICCa 0.008, ICCc 0.548, R² 0.51), FD (ICCa 0.425, ICCc 0.846, R² 0.96), and flow density (ICCa 0.451, ICCc 0.656, R² 0.65). The difference between the two devices was insignificant for MNV area (type 1: p=0.328; type 2: p=0.426; type 3: p=0.615), but significant for nodes per area (type 1: p=0.002; type 2: p=0.00001; type 3: p=0.003), FD (type 1: p<0.00001; type 2: p<0.00001; type 3: p=0.015) and flow density (type 1: p=0.0004; type 2: p=0.004; type 3: p=0.052).

Conclusion: MNV area is closely comparable between devices using SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA imaging. However, the two methods differ significantly in their precise assessment of the vascular morphology (FD, flow density, nodes per area). Therefore, results obtained using different devices are not comparable and should not be amalgamated in clinical trials.

Keywords: choroidal neovascularization; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; optical coherence tomography angiography.