[Diagnostic Value of ROC Curve Evaluating Serum Related Indexes for Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Hematopathy]

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Oct;28(5):1746-1749. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2020.05.052.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

AbstractObjective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum PCT, CRP and SAA for bloodstream infection(BSI) in patients with hematopathy.

Methods: Sixty hematopathy patients with bloodstream infection from July 2016 to June 2018 were selected and enroued in bloodstream infection group. Sixty-five patients with negative blood culture during the same period were selected and enrolled in non-bloodstream infection group. The ROC curves were drawn and used to eualuate the diagnostic value of above montioned indexes.

Results: The levels of PCT, CRP and SAA in the bloodstream infection group were higher than those in the non-bloodstream infection group (P<0.05). ROC curve showed that AUC values of PCT, CRP, SAA and the combined test detection were 0.868, 0.746, 0.678 and 0.900, respectively, there was no significant difference in AUC between combined test and PCT test (P>0.05). AUC of combined test and PCT test were higher than those of CRP and SAA test, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in AUC between CRP and SAA (P>0.05). The optimal PCT detection threshold was 0.49 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 75.0% and 83.1%, respectively. The optimal critical value for CRP detection was 15.76 mg/L, the sensitivity and specificity were 60.0% and 80.0% respectively. The optimal SAA detection threshold was 35.66 mg/L, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.7% and 53.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: PCT, CRP and SAA detection have good diagnostic value for blood stream infection in patients with hematopathy. The diagnostic value of PCT is better than CRP and SAA, and there is no significant difference in diagnostic value between combined test and PCT test.

题目: ROC曲线评价血清相关指标在血液病患者血流感染中的诊断价值.

目的: 评价血清降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血清淀粉样蛋白A (SAA)在血液病患者血流感染(BSI)中的诊断价值.

方法: 选取分析2016年7月-2018年6月医院诊断为血流感染的血液病患者60例,设为血流感染组;选择同期血培养阴性患者65例,设为非血流感染组。绘制ROC曲线对各指标诊断价值进行评价.

结果: 血流感染组PCT、CRP、SAA水平高于非血流感染组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,PCT、CRP、SAA及联合试验检测的AUC值分别为0.868、0.746、0.678和0.900。联合试验检测与PCT检测的AUC比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合试验检测及PCT检测的AUC分别大于CRP与SAA检测的AUC,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CRP与SAA检测的AUC差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PCT检测最佳临界值为0.49 ng/ml,敏感度与特异度分别为75.0%和83.1%。CRP检测最佳临界值为15.76 mg/L,敏感度与特异度分别为60.0%和80.0%。SAA检测最佳临界值为35.66 mg/L,敏感度与特异度分别为81.7%和53.8.

结论: 对于血液病患者PCT、CRP、SAA检测对血流感染有着较好的诊断价值,PCT诊断价值优于CRP与SAA,联合试验检测与PCT单项检测的诊断价值无显著差异.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteremia* / diagnosis
  • C-Reactive Protein / analysis
  • Calcitonin*
  • Humans
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Calcitonin
  • C-Reactive Protein