Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2083. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Abstract

Compared with drugs from the blockbuster era, recently authorized drugs and those expected in the future present a heterogenous mix of chemicals, biologicals, and cell and gene therapies, a sizable fraction being for rare diseases, and even individualized treatments or individualized combinations. The shift in the nature of products entails secular trends for the definitions of "drugs" and "target population" and for clinical use and evidence generation. We discuss that the lessons learned from evidence generation for 20th century medicines may have limited relevance for 21st century medicines. We explain why the future is not about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vs. real-world evidence (RWE) but RCTs and RWE-not just for the assessment of safety but also of effectiveness. Finally, we highlight that, in the era of precision medicine, we may not be able to reliably describe some small treatment effects-either by way of RCTs or RWE.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy / methods*
  • Cystic Fibrosis / drug therapy
  • Cystic Fibrosis / genetics
  • Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator / genetics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Humans
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
  • Mutation
  • Pharmacology / trends*
  • Precision Medicine
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*

Substances

  • CFTR protein, human
  • Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator