Background and purpose: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are well-known surrogates of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection but studies usually present data on either BNP or NT-proBNP. The aim was to determine and directly compare the validity of the two biomarkers as a tool to predict AF and guide prolonged cardiac monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients.
Methods: Non-lacunar acute ischaemic stroke (<72 h) patients over 55 years of age with cryptogenic stroke after standard evaluation were included in the Crypto-AF study and blood was collected. BNP and NT-proBNP levels were determined by automated immunoassays. AF was assessed by 28 days' monitoring. Highest (optimizing specificity) and lowest (optimizing sensitivity) quartiles were used as biomarker cut-offs to build predictive models adjusted by sex and age. The integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI) and DeLong test were used to compare the performance of the two biomarkers.
Results: From 320 patients evaluated, 218 were included in the analysis. AF was detected in 50 patients (22.9%). NT-proBNP (P < 0.001) and BNP (P < 0.001) levels were higher in subjects with AF and their levels correlated (r = 0.495, P < 0.001). BNP showed an increased area under the curve (0.720 vs. 0.669; P = 0.0218) and a better predictive capacity (IDI = 3.63%, 95% confidence interval 1.36%-5.91%) compared to NT-proBNP. BNP performed better than NT-proBNP in a specific model (IDI = 3.7%, 95% confidence interval 0.87%-6.5%), whilst both biomarkers performed similarly in the case of a sensitive model.
Conclusions: Both BNP and NT-proBNP were increased in cryptogenic stroke patients with AF detection. Interestingly, BNP outperforms NT-proBNP, especially in terms of specificity.
Keywords: BNP; NT-proBNP; atrial fibrillation; biomarkers; cryptogenic stroke.
© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.