Self-expanding metal stent in esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;39(5):445-449. doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01078-z. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

Background and aims: Placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option for esophageal perforation and leaks. The aim of our study was to assess the role of SEMS for the management of benign esophageal diseases such as perforations and anastomotic leaks.

Methods: All patients (n = 26) who underwent SEMS placement for esophageal perforation and anastomotic leaks between May 2012 and February 2019 were included. Data were analyzed in relation to the indications, type of stent used, complications, and outcomes.

Results: Indications for stent placement included anastomotic leaks 65% (n = 17) and perforations 35% (n = 9). Fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) was placed in 25 patients, and in 1, partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS) was placed. Stent placement was successful in all the patients (n = 26). Four patients did not report for follow-up after stenting. Among the patients on follow-up, 91% (20/22) had healing of the mucosal defect. Stent-related complications were seen in 5 (23%) patients and included stent migration [3], reactive hyperplasia [1] and stricture [1].

Conclusion: Covered stent placement for a duration of 8 weeks is technically safe and clinically effective as a first-line procedure for bridging and healing benign esophageal perforation and leaks.

Keywords: Achalasia cardia; Benign stricture; Esophageal foreign body; Esophageal leaks; Esophageal perforation; Esophagectomy; Iatrogenic; Mediastinitis; Therapeutic endoscopy.

MeSH terms

  • Anastomotic Leak / surgery*
  • Esophageal Perforation / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Self Expandable Metallic Stents* / adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome