Pedicled vascularized bone grafts compared with xenografts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion

Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):1017-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04828-y. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

Introduction: Fractures of the scaphoid account for 60-70% of all wrist bone fractures. The results of treatment in terms of bone healing vary depending on the type and location of the fracture, the time elapsed since the injury, the type of surgical treatment. Nonunion occurs in 5-15% of the cases on average. The purpose of this paper is to compare the surgical techniques and results of treating scaphoid nonunion (SNU) with osteoplastic xenografts of bovine origin or a vascularized autograft of the distal part of the dorsal radius.

Methods: We compare two groups of patients with symptomatic SNU, treated surgically with either a vascularized graft (n = 15) or a xenograft of bovine origin (n = 15). In the presurgical stage, the demographic characteristics of the patients, the time elapsed between injury and surgery, and classification of the injury (Schonberg, Herbert-Fisher, and Geissler-Slade) were recorded. One year following surgery, bone healing, total duration of the treatment, complications, the Mayo wrist score, and answers to the DASH questionnaire were analyzed.

Results: No statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients were observed for bone healing (86.7% vs 80%) or functional results. A highly significant difference was observed with respect to duration of the surgical intervention in favor of xenografts.

Conclusion: The xenograft method is simple and relatively acceptable, providing good results in terms of healing and functionality.

Keywords: Bone grafting; Scaphoid nonunion; Vascularized bone graft; Xenograft.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Cattle
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Fractures, Ununited* / surgery
  • Heterografts
  • Humans
  • Radius
  • Scaphoid Bone* / surgery